[condition] Add CreateServiceReadyCondition #572
Merged
+18
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Jira: OSPRH-4164
This was referenced Oct 24, 2024
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/barbican-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
gibizer
reviewed
Oct 29, 2024
gibizer
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2024
olliewalsh
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2024
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/nova-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/placement-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/barbican-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/cinder-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/designate-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/glance-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/heat-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/horizon-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/infra-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/ironic-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/manila-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/keystone-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/mariadb-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
This was referenced Oct 29, 2024
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/neutron-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/octavia-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/infra-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/mariadb-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/swift-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/telemetry-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/placement-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/infra-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
stuggi
added a commit
to stuggi/mariadb-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
openshift-merge-bot bot
pushed a commit
to openstack-k8s-operators/placement-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
openshift-merge-bot bot
pushed a commit
to openstack-k8s-operators/nova-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
d34dh0r53
pushed a commit
to d34dh0r53/keystone-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
gibizer
pushed a commit
to gibizer/mariadb-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2024
The current ExposeServiceReadyCondition can be confusing since it just reflects if the k8s service got created, but not the route to expose the public endpoint. This changes to a new CreateServiceReadyCondition to prevent this. Jira: OSPRH-4164 Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#572 Signed-off-by: Martin Schuppert <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Jira: OSPRH-4164